Open Journal Systems

The Impact of Renewable Energy Policies on Carbon Dioxide Emissions in the Latin American countries-A PVAR approach

Matheus Koengkan

Resumo


This article analyzes the impact of renewable energy policies on carbon dioxide emissions (CO2) in nine Latin American countries, in a period of 1991 to 2012. The Panel Vector Auto-Regressive (PVAR) was utilized. The results revealed that the renewable energy policies reduce the environmental degradation (CO2 emissions) in -0.0109, and the consumption of renewable energy -0.0231, while the economic growth and consumption oil increase the emissions in 0.9082 and 0.1437 respectively. These empirical findings will help the policymakers develop appropriate renewable energy policies, as well as help to advance the literature that approaches the impact of renewable energy policies on environmental degradation in the Latin America region.


Texto completo:

PDF

Referências


ABRIGO, M.R.M.; LOVE, I. Estimation of Panel Vector Autoregression in Stata: A Package of Programs. University of Hawai`i at Mānoa Department of Economics Working Paper Series, 2015. Available in:.

ARGENTEIRO, A.; BOLLINO, C.A.; MICHELI, S. Public Policy Options for Renewable Energy Source Development. Atlantic Economic Journal, v.43,p.513–514, 2015.doi.10.1007/s11293-015-9473-3.

ARELLANO, M.; BOVER, O. Another Look at the Instrumental Variable Estimation of Error Components Models. Journal of Econometrics, v.68,n.1 p.29–51, 1995.doi. 10.1016/0304-4076(94)01642-D.

ARCE, M.P.; SAUMA, E.; CONTRERAS, J. Renewable energy policy performance in reduction CO2 emissions. Energy Economics, v.54, p.272–280, 2016.doi. 10.1016/j.eneco.2015.11.024.

CARLEY, S.; BALDWIN, E.; MACLEAN, L.M.; BRASS, J.N. Global Expansion of Renewable Energy Generation: An Analysis of Policy Instruments. Environmental Resource Economics, p.1-44 2016.doi.10.1007/s10640-016-0025-3.

HINRICHS-RAHLWES, R. Renewable energy: paving the way towards sustainable energy, security lessons learnt from Germany. Renewable Energy, v.49, p.10–14, 2013. doi.10.1016/j.renene.2012.01.076.

HOLTZ-EAKING, D.; NEWEY, W.; ROSEN, H.S. Estimating vector autoregressions with panel data. Econometrica, v.56, n.6 p.1371-1395, 1988. Available in: < http://www.jstor.org/stable/1913103>.

HANSEN, L. P. Large sample properties of generalized method of moments estimators. Econometrica, v.50, n.4 p.1029-1054, 1982.Available in:< http://www.jstor.org/stable/1912775>.

IRENA, U.S. REMAP 2030.Mitigating Climate Change Thought Renewables: How Doubling the Renewable Energy Share Can Keep Global Temperatures in Check, 2014. Available in: < https://www.irena.org/remap/REmap-FactSheet-8-Climate%20Change.pdf.>.

LOVE, I.; ZICCHINO, L. Financial development and dynamic investment behavior: Evidence from panel VAR. The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, v.46, n.2,p.190–210,2006.doi. 10.1016/j.qref.2005.11.007.

O’BRIEN, R.M. A caution regarding rules of thumb for variance inflation factors. Quality & Quantity, v.41, n.5, p.673-690, 2007.doi. 10.1007/s11135-006-9018-6.

ORTEGA, M.; DEL RIO, P.; MONTERO, E.A. Assessing the benefits and costs of renewable electricity. The Spanish case. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, v.27, p.294–304, 2013.doi. 10.1016/j.rser.2013.06.012.

PESARAN, M.H. General Diagnostic Tests for Cross Section Dependence in Panels.p.1–42,2004. Available at: http://www.dspace.cam.ac.uk/handle/1810/446.

PESARAN, M.H. A simple panel unit root test in the presence of cross-section dependence. Journal of Applied Econometrics, v.22, n.2, p.256-312, 2007.doi. 10.1002/jae.951/pdf.

PESARAN, M.H.; SHIN, Y.; SMITH, R.P. Pooled mean group estimation of dynamic heterogeneous panels. Journal of American Statistical Association, v.94, n.446, p.621-634,1999. Available in: URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/2670182.

REDONDO, A.J.G.; COLLADO, R.R. An economic valuation of renewable electricity promoted by feed-in system in Spain. Renewable Energy, v.68, p.51–57, 2014.doi. 10.1016/j.renene.2014.01.028.

SMITH, M.G.; URPELAINEN, J. The Effect of Feed-in Tariffs on Renewable Electricity Generation: An Instrumental Variables Approach. Environment Resource Economy, v.57, p.367–392, 2014.doi. DOI 10.1007/s10640-013-9684-5.

STOKES, L. The politics of renewable energy policies: The case of feed-in tariffs in Ontario, Canada. Energy Policy, v.56, p.490–500, 2013.doi. 10.1016/j.enpol.2013.01.009.

THAPAR, S.; SHARMA, S.; VERMA, A. Economic and environmental effectiveness of renewable energy policy instruments: Best practices from India. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, v.66, p.487-498, 2016.doi. 10.1016/j.rser.2016.08.025.

VERMA, Y.P.; KUMAR, A. Potential impacts of emission concerned policies on power system operation with renewable energy sources. International Journal of Electrical Power & Energy Systems, v.44, n.1, p.520–529, 2013.doi. 10.1016/j.ijepes.2012.03.053.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5380/rber.v8i1.49819

Apontamentos

  • Não há apontamentos.