Colaboração para melhorar a escrita descritiva facilitada por Padlet: um estudo de pesquisa-ação do English as Foreign Language (EFL)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5380/atoz.v9i1.73517Palavras-chave:
Construtivismo, Colaboração, Redação Descritiva, Padlet.Resumo
Introdução: Este estudo foi realizado em um instituto tecnológico público em Guayaquil, Equador. Objetiva melhorar as habilidades de escrita por meio da colaboração entre estudantes através de Padlet. Participaram 18 estudantes matriculados no primeiro semestre. Metodologia: A aplicação do estudo concentrou-se em uma abordagem construtivista na qual os alunos puderam compartilhar ideias; dar e receber feedback entre colegas e professores; e construir seu próprio conhecimento e entendimento. Esta investigação durou mais de vinte e quatro horas/aula. Emprega um método quantitativo. Diferentes instrumentos, como pré-teste, pós-teste e questionários foram utilizados para a coleta de dados. Resultados: Após a prática, os alunos apresentaram uma melhora de cerca de 11 pontos no pós-teste em comparação ao pré-teste. O resultado deste estudo obteve um d = Cohen de 1,22. Conclusão: O questionário aplicado confirmou que os alunos identificaram a escrita colaborativa em Padlet como útil e enriquecedora. Esta pesquisa é dirigida a professores e diretores envolvidos no campo da educação de EFL que desejam melhorar suas práticas de ensino.
Referências
Abdullah, F. (2014). The effect of using Padlet on enhancing EFL writing performance. Master’s thesis, Al-Iman Muhammad Ibn Saud Islamic University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. Retrieved from https://www.awej.org/images/Theseanddissertation/FarahNasserAlgraini/farahalgrainifullthesis.pdf.
Ansarimoghaddam, S. & Bee, H. T. (2013). Co-constructing an essay: Collaborative writing in class and on wiki. 3L; language, linguistics and literature, The Southeast Asian Journal of English Language Studies, 19(1), 35-50. Retrieved from http://ejournals.ukm.my/3l/article/view/1079/1703.
Bhattacharjee, J. (2015). Constructivist approach to learning an effective approach of teaching learning. International Research Journal of Interdisciplinary & Multidisciplinary Studies, 1(6), 65-74. Retrieved from http://oaji.net/articles/2015/1707-1438677336.pdf.
Challob, I., Abu, N. & Latif, H. (2016). Collaborative blended learning writing environment: Effects on EFL students’ writing apprehension and writing performance. Canadian Center of Science and Education, 9(6), 3-13. doi: 10.5539/elt.v9n6p229.
Demirkan, O. (2019). Pre-service teachers' views about digital teaching materials. Educational Policy Analysis and Strategic Research, 14(1), 40-60. doi: 10.29329/epasr.2019.186.3.
Doolittle, P. (2014). Complex constructivism: A theoretical model of complexity and cognition. International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, 26(3), 485-498. Retrieved from https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1060852.pdf.
David, A.R., Thang, S. M. & Azman, H. (2015). Accommodating low proficiency ESL students' language learning needs through an online writing support system. E-Bangi Journal, 10(1): 118-126. Retrieved from http://journalarticle.ukm.my/9355/1/118-127_LANGUAGE_LEARNING-Rowena.pdf.
Duit, R. & Treagust, D. (1996). Improving teaching and learning in science and mathematics. New York and London: Teachers College Press.
Eggen, P. & Kauchak, D. (2010). Educational psychology: Windows on classrooms (8th. Ed.). French's Forest: Pearson.
Ferguson, P. (2011). Student perceptions of quality feedback in teacher education. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 36(1), 51-62. doi:10.1080/02602930903197883.
Fuchs, B. (2014). The writing is on the wall: Using Padlet for whole-class engagement. Library Faculty and Staff Publications, 40 (4), 7-9. Retrieved from https://uknowledge.uky.edu/libraries_facpub/240.
Graham, S., Harris, K. & McKeown, D. (2013). The writing of students with learning disabilities, meta-analysis of self-regulated strategy development writing intervention studies, and future directions: Redux. In h. Swanson, K. Harris, & S. Graham (Eds.), Handbook of learning disabilities (2. ed.) (pp. 405-438). New York: Guilford Press.
Guasch, T. & Espasa, A. (2015). Learning and Teaching Writing Online. Leiden: Brill.
Harmer, J. (2004). How to teach writing. Harlow: Pearson Education Limited.
Hussin, S., Abdullah, M. Y., Ismail, N., & Yoke, S. K. (2015). The effects of CMC applications on ESL writing anxiety among postgraduate students. English Language Teaching, 8(9), 167-172. doi: 10.5539/elt.v8n9p167.
Jafari, N. & Ansari, D. N. (2012). The effect of collaboration on Iranian EFL learners’ writing accuracy. International Education Studies, 5(2), 125-131. doi: 10.5539/ies.v5n2p125.
Krasnova, T. & Ananjev, A. (2015). Students’ perception of learning in the online discussion environment. Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences, 6(6), 202-207. doi: 10.5901/mjss.2015.v6n6s1p202.
Kim, B. G. (2010). Collaborative discussion and peer review activity in computer-mediated EFL writing. Multimedia Assisted Language Learning, 13(2), 105-128. Retrieved from http://kmjournal.bada.cc/wp-content/uploads/2013/05/13-2-5Kim.pdf.
Lai, C. L. & Hwang, G. J. (2016). A self-regulated flipped classroom approach to improving students’ learning performance in a mathematics course. Computers & Education, 100, 126-140. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2016.05.006.
Lee, L. (2002). Enhancing learners’ communication skills through synchronous electronic interaction and task-based instruction. Foreign Language Annals, 35(1), 16-24. doi: 10.1111/j.1944-9720.2002.tb01829.x.
Liu, J. & Hansen, J.G. (2002). Peer response in second language writing classrooms. Ann Arbor, MI: The University of Michigan Press.
Norton, L.S. (2019). Action Research in Teaching and Learning: A Practical Guide to Conducting Pedagogical Research in Universities. Abingdon: Routledge.
Putman, M. (2014, August 8). Re: Creating collaborative spaces using Padlet. [Web log message]. Retrieved from https://www.literacyworldwide.org/blog/literacy-daily/2014/08/08/creating-collaborative-spaces-using-padlet.
Simin, S. & Tavangar, M. (2009). Metadiscourse knowledge and use in Iranian EFL writing. Asian EFL Journal, 11(1), 230-255. Retrieved from http://www.asian-efl-journal.com/March_2009.pdf.
Storch, N. (2005). Collaborative writing: Product, process, and students’ reflections. Journal of Second Language Writing, 14(3), 153-173. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/248545505_Collaborative_writing_Product_process_and_students'_reflections.
Tan, B. H. (2011). Innovative writing centers and online writing labs outside North America. Asian EFL Journal, 13(2), 391-418. Retrieved from http://www.asian-efl-journal.com/PDF/June_2011.pdf.
Tomlinson, B. (2013). Developing materials for language teaching (pp. 189-205). London: Bloomsbury Academic.
Tsui, A. B. & Ng., M. (2000). Do secondary L2 writers benefit from peer comments? Journal of Second Language Writing, 9(2), 147-170. doi: 10.1016/S1060-3743(00)00022-9.
Wang, Y. & Chen, N. (2013). Engendering interaction, collaboration, and reflection in the design of online assessment in language learning: A reflection from the course designers. In B. Zou, M. Xing, Y. Wang, M. Sun, & C. Xiang (Eds.), Computer-Assisted Foreign Language Teaching and Learning: Technological Advances (pp. 16-39). Hershey, PA: IGI Global.
Widosari, A., Suwandi, S., Slamet, St.Y. & Winarni, R. (2017). DISE learning model for teaching writing to elementary school students. Sino-US English Teaching, 14(5), 279-285. doi:10.17265/1539-8072/2017.05.001.
Wiggins, G. (2012). Seven keys to effective feedback. Educational Leadership, 70(1), 10-16. Retrieved from http://www.ascd.org/publications/educational-leadership/sept12/vol70/num01/Seven-Keys-to-Effective-Feedback.aspx.
Yan, L. (2019). A study on weChat-based collaborative learning in college English writing, Canadian Center of Science and Education 12(6), 1-9. doi: 10.5539/elt.v12n6p.
Yu, S. & Lee. I. (2016). Peer feedback in second language writing (2005–2014). Language Teaching, 49(4), 461–493. doi:10.1017/S0261444816000161.
Zhi, Q. & Su, M. (2015). Enhance collaborative learning by visualizing process of knowledge building with Padlet. Paper presented in 2015 International Conference of Educational Innovation through Technology, 1, 221-225. doi:10.1109/eitt.2015.54.
Downloads
Publicado
Como Citar
Edição
Seção
Licença
A revista AtoZ é um periódico científico de acesso aberto e o copyright dos artigos e da entrevista pertence aos respectivos autores/entrevistados com cessão de direitos para a AtoZ no que diz respeito à inclusão do material publicado (revisado por pares/postprint) em sistemas/ferramentas de indexação, agregadores ou curadores de conteúdo.
Todo o conteúdo da Revista (incluindo-se instruções, política editorial e modelos) está sob uma licença Creative Commons Atribuição 4.0 Não Adaptada, a partir de Outubro de 2020.
Ao serem publicados por esta Revista, os artigos são de livre uso para compartilhar (copiar e redistribuir o material em qualquer suporte ou formato para qualquer fim, mesmo que comercial) e adaptar (remixar, transformar, e criar a partir do material para qualquer fim, mesmo que comercial). É preciso dar o crédito apropriado , prover um link para a licença e indicar se mudanças foram feitas .
A AtoZ não cobra qualquer tipo de taxa para submissão e/ou processamento e/ou publicação de artigos.
