Proposing a maturity model for electronic government sites
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5380/atoz.v4i1.42319Keywords:
Maturity model, E-government, Public servicesAbstract
Introduction: Given the increasing use of information technology, especially the Internet, by the government - as a means of interaction with citizens - the research presents a bibliographical study about maturity models for electronic government, approaching the issues of Public Services to conceptualize Electronic Government and Maturity in order to propose a maturity model for eletronic government websites. Method: An intentional collection of 24 models of maturity for electronic government was used and a comparative analysis was performed to seek for limitations in relation to the services, accessibility, usability and integration with social networks regarding a Brazilian reality and the e-MAG model. Results: It proposes a maturity model for electronic government sites, based on the convergence of the selected models, which consists of four stages focused on evaluating service requirements, accessibility, usability and social networking. Unlike the others, the proposed model takes into account both the accessibility guidelines for Internet World Wide Web Consortium (W3C), as well as those of accessibility and usability of the Brazilian government (e-MAG). Each stage of this model includes some examples of requirements that can be evaluated and, potentially, converted into indicators Conclusions: The use of a model to assess the maturity of electronic government sites could demonstrate the current situation of the e-gov site in relation to what is expected at each stage, and what is the conceptual line of evolution in the maturity model, bringing improvements for its users or the general public.
References
Alhomod, S. M., & Shafi, M. M. (2012). Best practices in egovernment: a review of some innovative models proposed in different countries. International Journal of Electrical and Computer Sciences, 12(1), 1–6. Recuperado de http://www.ijens.org/vol_12_i_01/122001-7878-ijecs-ijens.pdf
Almazan, G. J. R., R. S. (2008). E-government portals in Mexico. Recuperado em 14 set. 2014, de http://www.igi-global.com/chapter/electronic-government-concepts-methodologies-tools/9818
Andersen, K. V., & Henriksen, H. Z. (2002). E-government maturity models: extension of the Layne and Lee model. Government Information Quarterly, 23(2), 236–248. Recuperado de http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2005.11.008
Araújo, E. N. d. (2007). Curso de direito administrativo (3a. ed.). São Paulo: Saraiva.
Barbosa, J. L. (2010). Política pública, gestão municipal e participação social na construção de uma agenda de direitos à cidade. Scripta Nova: Revista electrónica de geografía y ciencias sociales, 14(331). Recuperado de http://www.ub.edu/geocrit/sn/sn-331/sn-331-51.htm
Baum, C., & Di Maio, A. (2000). Gartner’s four phases of e-government model. Recuperado em 28 set. 2014, de https://www.gartner.com/doc/317292/gartners-phases-egovernment-model
United Nations. (2012). E-government survey 2012: egovernment for the people. Recuperado em 11 nov. 2014, de http://unpan1.un.org/intradoc/groups/public/documents/un/unpan048065.pdf
Brasil. (2009). Padrões web em governo eletrônico: guia de administração. Brasília: SLTI. Recuperado de http://epwg.governoeletronico.gov.br/cartilha-usabilidade
Brasil. (2014). eMAG: Modelo de acessibilidade em governo eletrônico. Brasília: SLTI.
Brasil. (2014b). Govbr. governo eletrônico brasileiro. Recuperado em 14 nov. 2014, de http://governoeletronico.gov.br/
Carnegie Mellon University. (2006). Software Engineering Institute. CMMI para desenvolvimento – versão 1.2: melhoria de processos visando melhores produtos. Recuperado em 20 jun. 2015, de http://www.sei.cmu.edu/library/assets/whitepapers/cmmi-dev_1-2_portuguese.pdf
Castells, M. (2002). A sociedade em rede (6a. ed.). São Paulo: Paz e Terra.
Chahim, A., Cunha, M. A., Knight, P. T., & Pinto, S. L. (2004). E-gov.br: a próxima revolução brasileira. São Paulo: Pratice Hall.
Chandler, S., & Emanuels, S. (2002). Transformation not automation. In Proceedings of 2nd european conference on e-government (p. 91–102). United Kingdom. Recuperado em 18 set. 2014, de http://books.google.com/books?hl=en&lr=&id=3YZP9nBw7AUC&oi=fnd&pg=PA92&dq=Transformation+not+automation&ots=aFmYqHoV3x&sig=61L6hnIMq50kPKoh9ujsdITEDD4
Chen, J., Yan, Y.,& Mingins, C. A. (2011). Three-dimensional model for e-government development: with cases in China’s regional e-government practice and experience. In Management of e-Commerce and e-Government (p. 113–120). Hubei, China. Recuperado em 20 set. 2014, de http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/xpls/abs_all.jsp?arnumber=6092643
Cisco Systems Inc. (2008). E-government best practices learning from success, avoiding the pitfalls. Recuperado em 15 set. 2014, de http://siteresources.worldbank.org/EXTEDEVELOPMENT/Resources/20080222_Phil_eGov_workshop.pdf?resourceurlname=20080222_Phil_eGov__workshop.pdf
Deloitte Touche. (2000). At the dawn of e-Government: The citizen as customer. Government Finance Review, 16(5). Recuperado em 9 nov. 2014, de https://www.questia.com/magazine/1G1-67323089/at-the-dawn-of-e-Government-the-citizen-as-customer
Di Pietro, M. S. Z. (2012). Direito administrativo (25a. ed.). São Paulo: Atlas.
Dziekaniak, G. V. (2012). Método para inclusão de conhecimento presente em mídias sociais no aprimoramento de plataformas de governo eletrônico (Doutorado em Engenharia e Gestão do Conhecimento, Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina, Florianópolis). Recuperado de http://repositorio.ufsc.br/xmlui/handle/123456789/100908
Ferrer, F., & Santos, P. (2004). E-government: o governo eletrônico no brasil. São Paulo: Saraiva.
Guerreiro, E. P. (2006). Cidade digital: infoinclusão social e tecnologia em rede. São Paulo: SENAC.
Hiller, J. S., & Belanger, F. (2001). Privacy strategies for electronic government. In M. Abramson & G. E. Means (Eds.), E-government 2001: Ibm endowment for the bussiness of government. USA: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.
Howard, M. (2001). E-government across the globe: how will ’e’ change government. Government Finance Review, 17(4). Recuperado em 2 nov. 2014, de https://www.questia.com/magazine/1G1-78902832/e-Government-across-the-globe-how-will-e-change
Kim, D. Y.,& Grant, G. (2010). E-government maturity model using the capability maturity model integration. Journal of Systems & Information Technology, 3(12), 230–244. Recuperado de http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/13287261011070858
Laudon, K. C., & Laudon, J. P. (2013). Sistemas de informação gerenciais (9a. ed.). São Paulo: Pearson Pretice Hall.
Layne, K., & Lee, J. (2001). Developing fully functional egovernment: a four stage model. Government Information Quarterly, 2(18), 122–136. Recuperado de http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0740-624X(01)00066-1
Lee, G., & Kwak, Y. H. (2012). An open government maturity model for social media-based public engagement. Government Information Quarterly, 29(4), 492–503. Recuperado de http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2012.06.001
Meirelles, H. L. (1996). Direito municipal brasileiro (8a. ed.). São Paulo: Malheiros.
Moon, M. J. (2002). The evolution of e-government among municipalities: Rhetoric or reality? Public Administration Review, 4(62), 424–433. Recuperado de http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/0033-3352.00196
Netchaeva, I. (2002). E-government and e-democracy a comparison of opportunities in the north and south. International Communication Gazette, 5(64), 467–477. Recuperado de http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/17480485020640050601
Paula Filho, W. d. (2011). Engenharia de software: fundamentos, métodos e padrões. Rio de Janeiro: LTC.
Reddick, C. G. (2004). A two-stage model of e-government growth: theories and empirical evidence for US cities. Government Information Quarterly, 1(21), 51–64. Recuperado de http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2003.11.004
Rezende, D. A. (2012). Planejamento de estratégias e informações municipais para cidade digital: guia para projetos em prefeituras e organizações públicas. São Paulo: Atlas.
Rohleder, S. J., & Jupp, V. (2003). E-government leadership: engaging the customer. Recuperado em 4 nov. 2014, de http://nstore.accenture.com/acn_com/PDF/Engaging_the_Customer.pdf
Santos, R. d. L. (2002). Governo eletrônico: o que se deve e o que não se deve fazer. Recuperado em 10 nov. 2014, de http://www.egov.ufsc.br/portal/sites/default/files/anexos/5694-5686-1-PB.pdf
Shahkooh, K. A., Saghafi, F., & Abdollahi, A. (2008). A proposed model for e-government maturity. In Information and communication technologies: From theory to applications (p. 1–5). Damasco, Síria. Recuperado de http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/xpls/abs_all.jsp?arnumber=4529948
Siau, K., & Long, Y. (2005). Synthesizing e-government stage models–a meta-synthesis based on meta-ethnography approach. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 4(105), 443–458. Recuperado de http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/02635570510592352
United Kingdon. (2002). Government on the web II. Recuperado em 14 nov. 2014, de http://www.nao.org.uk/publications/0102/government_on_the_web_ii
WCAG. (2014). Diretrizes de acessibilidade para conteúdo web. Recuperado em 11 nov. 2014, de http://www.w3.org/Translations/WCAG20-pt-br/
Wescott, C. G. (2001). E-government in the Asia-pacific region. Asian Journal of Political Science, 2(9), 1–24. Recuperado de http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02185370108434189
West, D. M. (2004). E-government and the transformation of service delivery and citizen attitudes. Public Administration Review, 1(64), 15–27. Recuperado de http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2004.00343.x
Windley, P. J. (2002). Egovernment maturity. Recuperado em 14 nov. 2014, de http://www.windley.com/docs/eGovernmentMaturity.pdf
Zugman, F. (2006). Governo eletrônico: saiba tudo sobre essa revolução. São Paulo: Livro Pronto.
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Atoz is a open access journal and the authors have permission and are encouraged to deposit their papers in personal web pages, institutional repositories or portals before (pre-print) or after (post-print) the publication at AtoZ. It is just asked, when and where possible, the mention, as a bibliographic reference (including the atributted URL), to the AtoZ Journal.
The authors license the AtoZ for the solely purpose of disseminate the published work (peer reviewed version/post-print) in aggregation, curation and indexing systems.
The AtoZ is a Diadorim/IBICT green academic journal.
All the journal content (including instructions, editorial policies and templates) - except where otherwise indicated - is under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International, since October 2020.
When published by this journal, articles are free to share (copy and redistribute the material in any support or format for any purpose, even commercial) and adapt (remix, transform, and create from the material for any purpose , even if commercial). You must give appropriate credit , provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made
AtoZ does not apply any charges regarding manuscripts submission/processing and papers publication.
